Generally speaking, I try not to pick up duplicate typewriters. A new typewriter either has to be a make or model I do not have or have a typeface I do not have. The nice thing about general rules is that they are general. I decided to blow off some steam at the nearby antique mall. There are some beat up ’60s Royals there as well as a nice Hermes Rocket that someone should buy. I have an older Hermes Rocket. During this visit, however, I spied a 3-bank Underwood portable. It appeared to be in nice shape, and the broken drawstring put it at a decent price. Given the absence of the case lid, I offered a lower price. The seller, with whom I’ve swapped stories before, agreed. This typewriter also lacks quality decals.
That said, I did not want someone to turn it into a non-working display piece, so I took it home. It will be easy enough to fix the drawstring, but the machine comes with the usual flattened rollers, making paper insertion difficult. One thing at a time. This 3-bank was manufactured in 1924, whereas my other one is from 1925. 
I like seeing the two of them together, like two small mechanical pets keeping each other company.

Nice Underwood 3 bank. Run and long bolt through it and put a nut on the end and chuck it up in a drill and sand it round the best you can and heat shrink does wonders. I’ve saved several typewriters with flat feed rollers that way. Works for platens too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Have you tried using Fimo Classic to create new rollers? I was reading about it tonight.
LikeLike
I’ve got to do a bit of research on that. This it the first I heard of it.
I’ve used rubber fuel line on rollers that were beyond help with sanding and heat shrink.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A few websites bring it up. I am thinking about trying it out: https://www.instructables.com/id/Repairing-Typewriter-Feed-Rollers/
LikeLike
Can’t beat the old ones. Well crafted and solid. Doubt that you could ever have too many, duplicates or otherwise.
I wish We had a place so well stocked. Next time I’m down in FL, I’ll have to find that place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed. They need some more work, but that’s to be expected. You are welcome to a tour of my collection!
LikeLike
I can relate to this, even though I’m collecting at the other end of the evolutionary scale. I tell myself, I only need one example of a Brother, one example of a Canon, a Panasonic, etc., but then there are the different categories to consider… curiosity always gets the better of me.
LikeLike
I think, perhaps foolishly, that I am one of few people in my territory who can preserve these machines—and do some repairs. I guess that’s why I made the purchase. I don’t have the ability to work on your machines. Mad props to you. If you had to keep one machine, what would it be?
LikeLike
I don’t have the skills to work on my machines also. So they’re potentially disposable. I think for practical use the Canon AP-1500 is best of breed.
LikeLike
These are so cute.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s one of these at Ace Typewriter in Portland–the first I’ve seen and been able to get my hands on. It’s a sweet little machine. The three-bank mechanism with its triple slugs is so exotic to me that I’d always imagined it dated from the teens, not the twenties.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s part of the portable package, I guess—like the Corona 3. I suppose that, if you were used to the 3-bank, the 4-bank might seem bulky and unnecessary—for certain writers, anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person